About Me

Name: Raffy
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Professor Obama and The Great Wall of Inequity

What Obama proposes is for MORE Federal aid to be distributed to public schools. So the schools would get more aid, more cash, more resources, in hopes of improving test scores and the quality of education for the students. I would think that schools or districts that are taken over by the government sometimes fair better, for the short term, but I wouldn't say throwing money at a public school problem specifically, is going to make it better.

Teachers need better game plans, better education, not just on teaching but on coaching, on advising, on counseling, not merely throwing information at kids but instilling a passion for learning, for debate, for writing and reading, for solving problems and for creativity. There is a quality issue in this country when it comes to public education, obviously the understatement of the century. In life, you get what you pay for, except when it comes to federal programs.

What I suspect Obama is doing when he promises more Federal funding of public schools is telling those teachers, administrators, parents and students that he will give them more, and it is an implicit exchange for a vote. What I suspect Obama omits is that the Federal aid hasn't done much good until now, and that the better schools are the ones that simply cost more, unfortunately. I have been a homeowner for a few years now, but my family doesn't enjoy the education that is funded in our neighborhoods via property tax. I would propose, as McCain has endorsed, a voucher program that says 'here's the cash available that would normally go to educating your child the way the government sees fit- locally at the closest school, regardless of quality - please feel free to use it to educate your child as YOU see fit'. It's so much more than choice, it is liberation from the ridiculous cycle of ineptitude that is the public education system. Teachers are unionized, they don't care as much about the kids (the unions at least) as they do about getting more money to perform the same or even worse. The public school administrations are more police forces and politicians than educators in the public school environment. The environment, if we must speak the truth, must change. It must be conducive to learning. It must be driven by true educators, with the input of parents. It must be cognizant of what the public demands of students and graduates- a MASTERY of English, a MASTERY of math and science and social studies, a MASTERY of the skills and information needed to survive in the post-public school world. If the best schooling a child can receive is rendered 'off limits' because of a voucher-free policy, the government is not doing the CHILD any justice. The best bet is to give the cash expended on the child's behalf, without the parent's input, to the person most responsible for that child's welfare, THE PARENT. Let the parent(s) decide where their child will best be educated, which is a fast way to get to the number and quality of schools this country deserves.

What the NEA and other teacher organizations, with the sometimes assumed support of teachers and the almost consistent objection of parents, want is a perpetuation of the status quo: less hurdles for teaching credentials, more job guarantees through less performance-based recruiting and retention and raises, more control, less interference. We have the finest schools in the world, it's just that few of them are public. That's the issue. The schools are there, and the only thing between YOUR child and the best education they can possibly get, is Senator Obama's crazy notion that he knows what school's best for your child. That's not only arrogant, it's obstructionist and in the end, a national security issue as was discussed in the debate tonight.

If you 'believe the children are our future', let parents invest in them. The government has done a horrible job thus far, and maybe it's time to 'share the wealth' and let parents have access to federal funds to educate their children in a positive, safe environment and with a level of quality that is currently unavailable to them without vouchers.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive